Two points were introduced in the 3rd letter from the Beacon Police Union - by way of the Teamsters Local 445 letter - but verification was not provided. Being that these were large assertions, A Little Beacon Blog followed up with the Mayor’s Office for confirmation. This morning, we received clarification from City Administrator Anthony Ruggiero as to the two points from the last letter from the police union. They are as follows:

Bullet Proof Vests

In exploring what a re-imagined police department and policies look like, Beacon’s City Council has held a public community forum to hear feedback from the community, and invited police officers to 2 City Council Workshop meetings to discuss data and current policy. Everything from how data is collected and reported, to the visual impact of a bullet proof vest on emotional escalation have been mentioned.

No formal policies have been proposed in this introductory discovery phase. Governor Cuomo has also mandated that each municipality come up with their own police policy, or face a denial of federal funding. The deadline for that proposal is April 1, 2021. During this past week’s City Council Workshop Meeting 7/13/2020, Mayor Kyriacou proposed a timetable as to how this project can get done in time. The Governor signed this on June 12, 2020: “Governor Cuomo Signs Executive Order to Reinvent and Modernize Police Strategies and Programs” Beacon’s City Council started this process before it was a state mandate, as A Little Beacon Blog reported earlier.

The past 2 letters from the Beacon Police Union have mentioned the fear of having bullet proof vests removed from officers when they answer police calls. The last letter read: “For the past several weeks, Mayor Kyriacou and the Council have continued their push of anti-police rhetoric and policies, which have included the thought of disarming and de-vesting police.“

A Little Beacon Blog asked for confirmation from the city about the removal of bullet proof vests, if that is indeed what the letter and term “de-vest” referred to, and received the following answer from Anthony Ruggiero: “I know residents have brought this up at the public portion of the meetings, but to the best of my knowledge, I do not believe any Council Members have proposed this.”

The Police Chief Carrying A Gun

A second point made in the letter, which was a continuation of a verbal comment made by union representative Mike Pitt, was certification of the Acting Police Chief William (Bill) Cornett, being that he was in retirement for a number of years. During the appointment, Mayor Kyriacou stated in response that legally, the city was cleared to hire Bill. A Little Beacon Blog followed up with the city to get a response from the City’s attorney for added clarification, and received it (you can read that legalese here).

In its most recent letter, the which was not signed but was on union letterhead that includes the names Dan Maldonado, President, and Barry Russell, Secretary-Treasurer, the letter insinuated that because of the length of time in retirement, the Acting Police Chief would be limited in his capacity as a police officer. The letter stated:

“Without that certification, the appointed temporary Chief ‘lacks the power to execute arrest and search warrants, make arrests without a warrant and use physical or deadly force in making an arrest when necessary’; he ‘may not lawfully carry a firearm without a license if he is not certified as a police officer.’ 2003 N.Y. Op. (Inf.) Atty’ Gen. 1. If this Chief sees a crime being committed, he cannot make an arrest; he needs to call the police.”

A Little Beacon Blog inquired with the City to see if arresting someone or being in the line of duty was the primary responsibility of this Acting Police Chief for the 90 days he is in the position during a time of administrative transition. Anthony Ruggiero responded: “The Chief of Police position lends itself to be more administrative, very similar to other Department Head positions.”